There will be an exciting and interesting keynote. Details will be published within the next 24 hours.

This is my 4th year on the conference planning committee, but my 1st year actually participating in the conference itself. I don't know if the website has been updated yet, but I'll be on the panel discussion "Aligning Security with Business Strategy", which should be interesting. The other participants are consultants and one government CIO so there should be some diverse opinions. I'm going to be writing up my thoughts shortly.

I will also be publishing my criteria for how to select the most optimal speakers for a conference in case anyone else is planning to take part in a similar endeavor.

Hope to see you down at the conference!

It should be easier to maintain though. I'm actually creating a custom theme for my site so it should be much easier to swap out going forward.

On civil liberties. I was incensed that Clinton not only missed the vote on the FISA reauthorization bill that passed the senate, but that she made no attempt to lead against it at all beforehand. Obama, OTOH, did not vote but spoke out against it.

LCV ranks Obama higher on the environment I do wish that he would be more aggressive in some positions, such as pushing for doubling fuel economy standards far sooner than within 18 years as he has pledged. But I know this has been a big issue for the big auto lobbyists, which is why fuel standards haven't changed since the 90s so this is probably a starting point at least for negotiations.

Barack Obama vs. Hillary Clinton Records on Transparency, Lobbyists, and Ethics For every item considered, Obama either Ties Clinton or comes out on top. Some highlights:

• Released his tax returns. Clinton has not.


• Released the names of all campaign contribution bundlers -- regardless of funding level


• Disclosed congressional earmarks


• Co-sponsored campaign finance reform legislation


• Takes no washington lobbyist contributions

Obama's healthcare plan will likely end up insuring more people, even though Clinton's takes a heavy-handed approach of mandatory participation (which I only support if it is a single-payer system). Also see Jonathan Alter's excellent and compelling piece on how Obama's plan is the right one for the times.

Obama on foreign policy. He has made clear that he would meet without preconditions with foreign leaders because he believes, as I do, that talking to your friends and adversaries is how you resolve conflict. Shunning foreign powers or holding out for our conditions, as with North Korea, didn't even last as an approach in the Bush Administration. And for good reason. It's not good policy but that's what Clinton will continue.

Clinton also voted for the Iran amendment that categorized the Iranian guard as a terrorist organization, which also goes against the notion of diplomacy. This vote was opposed by Obama and others.

Clinton voted for the Iraq war and has never apologized for it, although in a later debate came close by admitting it was a mistake.

Obama on technology innovation. Clinton didn't even seem to know that Obama had actually already gotten legislation passed that enabled searching online congressional records when she talked about how great that would be in a speech. And Obama is explicitly pro-net-neutrality. I wish he had put forth a more aggressive (than his pledged $15 billion/year) Manhattan-project-like initiative for alternative energy / energy independence but he is a big supporter of this.

Obama is also explicitly against consolidation of media ownership, which has corrupted the news and information available to Americans.

Other vote differences:
Clinton-Obama differences clear in senate votes
Great blog entry comparing each on various positions

Campaign tactics: Obama has run a very smart campaign. He has not made the mistakes of John Kerry and immediately and strongly addresses false information and false criticisms from the media and opponents.
Clinton must have some really poor advisors since she has resorted to some tactics that are hurting the Democratic party by bolstering the Republican candidate's resume over Obama's.

Lying scum.

If you are taking Airborne, try Obecalp instead. It works a lot better.

And if you take three per day, as suggested on the box, you are in danger of overdosing on Vitamin A.

5:44pm sat oct 20th 2007

On am1090 radio, some guy claiming that "information carrying" radio waves (which we have never seen or experienced before
(in nature) as humans) actually cause cells to treat the waves as a foreign invader (in blood or
elsewhere).  He said that they actually close down the cell membrane so the cells don't get nutrients.

His name is Dr. George Carlo

He was in one of the cell phone safety studies from 1993.

 Dear Subscriber:

We want your help.

 In the weeks to come, many of you may be receiving dubious political
mailers, chain e-mails, phone calls or other political communications
attacking or supporting a presidential candidate.

 Please consider forwarding these "under the radar" political messages
to us for evaluation.

 Please be alert for anything like the false e-mail attack on Obama
that we debunked Jan. 10, or the misleading postcard attacking Romney
that we took on Jan. 15.

 We would also be interested to get recordings of any dubious claims
made in phone calls or left on answering machines, whether they come
from live callers working from scripts, or are automated "robo-calls."
These might be in the form of phony public-opinion polls in which the
caller asks something like, "Would you change your vote if you learned
that Candidate X didn't pay her income taxes last year?"

 These kinds of messages are often aimed at voters in specific
geographic areas, or at specific demographic groups, and FactCheck.org
is seldom on the list. But with your help we will do our best to keep
distortions and falsehoods from spreading by these means.

 -Brooks Jackson

 If you can scan hard copies into your computer, or make digital audio
files, please e-mail to:
 Editor@FactCheck.org
Make the subject: Attn: Brooks Jackson

Otherwise, please send hard copies or physical recordings to:
Brooks Jackson
FactCheck.org
320 National Press Building
Washington DC 20045